Olumide Osaigbovo Akpata, the Labour Party candidate in the 2024 Edo State gubernatorial election, has announced his decision not to challenge the recently concluded election results at the tribunal.
In a statement released on Saturday, Akpata explained that his choice is based on an in-depth reflection on the state of Nigeria’s democracy, and his desire to focus on the systemic issues that undermine the electoral process.
Akpata highlighted that the irregularities observed in the election, including widespread vote-buying and questionable collation procedures, are symptomatic of deeper problems in the country’s electoral system. “These are not mere technical infractions but fundamental breaches of the social contract between the government and the governed,” he stated.
Despite having an experienced legal team, Akpata emphasised that the decision not to approach the tribunal was not a concession to injustice but a principled stand against a flawed system. “The burden of proof placed on petitioners is not just high; it is often insurmountable,” he said, pointing to the practical challenges in accessing critical electoral materials held by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
Akpata dispelled rumours of a clandestine alliance with the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), calling the allegations false and malicious. “The APC’s governance record in our state and across the nation speaks for itself—a litany of unfulfilled promises and a disturbing disregard for the rule of law,” he asserted, reaffirming his commitment to integrity and his long-standing reputation for transparency in public service.
Looking forward, Akpata outlined his strategy for the future, which includes advocating for comprehensive electoral reform, building a vibrant opposition in Edo State, investing in civic education, and forging alliances with civil society and international bodies. He stressed the importance of continuing the fight for a more robust and transparent democratic framework.
“My decision is not an indication of compromise; rather, it is a strategic move aimed at redirecting our energies toward systemic changes that our democracy desperately needs,” Akpata concluded.
