A police officer has threatened to shoot at members of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) at the Federal High Court, Abuja. IPOB members, including the one threatened by the policeman, were at the court to show solidarity with their embattled leader, Nnamdi Kanu.
In a video obtained by SaharaReporters, the police officer was heard telling the people to leave the court premises and go elsewhere.
He was also seen chasing one of the IPOB members.
It is not clear what had transpired but the officer during the pursuit brought out a gun and later cautioned himself against shooting.
The officer said, “I don’t need you here right now, you disperse or keep calm. We don’t want this gathering in this court, go in peace! You don’t want to go?”
He was however countered by IPOB members who said they have come for the court hearing and had not come for a fight.
They said, “Where do you want us to go? We are here for peace. We are here for Nnamdi Kanu. We are not here to fight.”
Meanwhile, on Sunday, Aloy Ejimakor, special counsel for the detained leader of the IPOB, warned security agents against molesting Kanu’s supporters who might want to show up at the Federal High Court, Abuja on Monday for the IPOB leader’s trial.
In a press statement sent to SaharaReporters, Ejimakor said he was prompted to issue the warning based on media reports indicating that those coming to Abuja to show solidarity with his client will be harassed or even arrested by security agents.
He noted that anybody who wishes to be at the court would not be doing anything illegal, provided such a person comes in peace, albeit he added that this was not an invitation for Kanu’s supporters to throng the courtroom.
He said: “Kanu’s trial is an open trial, not a secret trial and he’s presumed innocent until proven guilty. Therefore, anybody wishing to be associated with his trial by being present in Abuja is protected by his Constitutional right to freedom of association and movement.
“So, my message to all supporters of Kanu and even to Nigerian government is simple and that is: Everybody should be strictly guided by the rule of law pertinent to why Nnamdi Kanu is facing these tribulations and trials.
“That pertinent rule of law is clearly codified by CAP A9, Laws of Federation of Nigeria, where it is stated at Article 20 that: ‘All peoples shall have the right to existence. They shall have the unquestionable and inalienable right to self-determination. They shall freely determine their political status and shall pursue their economic and social development according to the policy they have freely chosen’.
“Above is the fulcrum of every other crime the Nigerian government is alleging against Kanu. Therefore, once government recognises that the enterprise upon which Kanu is engaged is expressly recognised or protected by laws, it will see that dialogue, not trials and violence is the only legal pathway to containing it.
“I am saying this because the same law that protects self-determination also requires the government to accommodate it. Article 1 of that Law provides that Nigeria ‘shall recognise the rights, duties and freedoms enshrined in the Charter and shall undertake to adopt legislative or other measures to give effect to them’.
“Further, subjecting Kanu to any trial under the circumstances of his extraordinary rendition will face lots of legal challenges. Where the government missed its way is believing that it can suppress the desire for self-determination by means of punishment of some sort. History teaches that taking such a path ultimately proves fruitless,
“So, what is expected on Monday is not a trial in terms of taking evidence but a procedural routine lawyers call ‘taking a plea’ or a re-arraignment on the amended charges that might be brought.
“Should that happen, the procedure permits taking an adjournment to study the new charges for the purpose of advising the defendant on the next steps.
“So, there’s nothing significant that will happen on Monday that warrants anybody, including the government, to be jittery.”
Kanu has been in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) since his arrest and extradition to Nigeria from Kenya to face charges bordering on treasonable felony, among others.